History of Mechanical Integrity
Definition of Mechanical Integrity
Mechanical Integrity (MI) can be defined as the management of critical process equipment to ensure it is designed and installed correctly and that it is operated and maintained properly. MI is 1 of the 14 elements included in the OSHA Process Safety Management standard. MI includes equipment/assets such as pressure vessels, storage tanks, piping systems, and associated hardware (valves, fittings, etc.), relief devices, and emergency shutdown/control systems.
MI encompasses the activities necessary to ensure that equipment/assets are designed, fabricated, installed, operated and maintained in a way that provides the desired performance in a safe, environmentally protected, and reliable fashion.
Early History of Mechanical Integrity in the United States
In the early 1900s, the need to protect workers and the public from the hazards of boilers and pressurized equipment became apparent, so the industry began to develop design standards. After World War II, a number of industry consensus standards were developed by the National Board Inspection Code (NBIC). By the 1980s, the American Petroleum Institute (API) led industry efforts to develop and implement important MI standards, while the federal government also turned its regulatory attention to MI. API, industry, and the regulators have addressed MI head-on since the early-90s, particularly through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Process Safety Management (PSM) program and the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Risk Management Program (RMP), as well as many additional Standards and Recommended Practices (RPs) published by API.
Advancing Process Safety Initiative
API and the American Fuels and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) jointly manage the Advancing Process Safety Initiative which is a joint effort to further advance process safety improvements in refining and petrochemical plants by providing industry with more opportunities to communicate and share experiences and knowledge. Through this partnership, API and AFPM collect process safety performance metrics, share process safety event information, produce and share Practices Sharing and Hazard Identification documents, host Regional Networks meetings, address issue-specific topics such as Mechanical Integrity and Human Reliability. API also operates a program that assesses a site’s Process Safety systems using independent and credible third party teams of industry-qualified process safety expert assessors. Through the use of industry developed protocols, the assessments evaluate both the quality of the written programs and the effectiveness of implementation, including a site’s Mechanical Integrity program.
Resources Available
API has taken an active role in the creation and propagation of MI information and materials. API committees create Standards and RPs that address MI, largely in the areas of inspection and repair of pressure vessels, aboveground storage tanks, equipment reliability, corrosion, mechanics, and reducing capital and maintenance costs.
These documents provide expectations on implementation and compliance, and many contain requirements in the form of “shall” statements, as determined by industry consensus committees. The creation of these industry-wide standards allows for procedures and practices to seamlessly continue at a company despite challenges presented by a dynamic and changing workforce. Institutional knowledge is no longer limited to a few senior employees, and “gut feeling” is replaced with tried-and-true methods contained in the Standards and RPs. Because they must be applicable to many different sites, API committees write their documents in a way that still allows managers to operate in the most safe and effective manner as dictated by their own facility’s needs. The motivation for writing API MI Standards and RPs was based on safety, competition, and budgeting challenges, as well as myriad external pressures, but the adoption of these documents has led to more valuable inspection data, increased ability to handle changing process conditions, and the scheduling and budgeting challenges of planned inspections, among other things. API Standards and RPs are periodically reviewed so that they remain relevant and valuable to the industry, and a review of past standards and updates shows how well the industry has adapted to changing times and MI science.
How to Use this Website
This website is designed to acquaint the reader with the MI resources available in API Standards, Recommended Practices, and other helpful resources. The information is organized topically, is searchable, and “companion” documents meant to complement one another are highlighted and listed together. Links are provided if the reader is interested in purchasing referenced documents.
Mechanical Integrity Timeline
View a timeline of document First Editions here.
1958 |
API 510 Pressure Vessel Inspection Code First Edition Published |
1984 |
Bhopal Disaster |
1990 |
API RP 750 Management of Process Hazards First Edition Published |
1991 |
API Std. 653 Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction First Edition Published |
1992 |
OSHA PSM Final Rule |
1993 |
API 570 Piping Inspection Code First Edition Published |
1998 |
Chemical Safety Board Formed |
1999 |
EPA Risk Management Program Final Rule |
2000 |
API Publ. 581 Risk-Based Inspection Base Resource Document First Edition Published |
2006 |
Baker Panel Refinery Safety Review |
2007 |
OSHA Refinery National Emphasis Program Effective Date |
2010 |
|
2012 |
First API Site Assessment |